Balance backs new collective claim against Apple

Balance Legal Capital is backing a proposed £768 million collective claim in the UK against Apple Inc. and its subsidiaries in relation to automatic iOS updates which included a throttling feature that led to unexpected shutdowns or poor device performance.

The claim alleges that Apple has breached competition law by abusing its dominant position in the relevant iPhone and iOS markets by selling iPhones with defective batteries that were unable to deliver peak power and pushing automatic iOS updates to iPhones which incorporated a power management tool which slowed down the iPhones and caused performance issues. It alleges that this conduct was exploitative since Apple was not behaving in a fair and transparent manner that enhanced consumer benefits and welfare. Instead, it sought to preserve its own reputation, brand loyalty and profitability, and hence its market position at the expense of its customers who were denied benefits in terms of price, quality, innovation or value for money.

The claim is being filed with the Competition Appeal Tribunal on an opt-out basis. Law firm Charles Lyndon is representing the proposed class representative.

Claim details.

Keep Reading

In the News

Covid outbreak on Ruby Princess ‘not an accident’ and cruise should never have sailed, court told

Charterer Carnival and shipowner Princess Cruise Lines are facing a class action currently being heard by Australia’s Federal Court over claims they were responsible for the 2020 Covid outbreak on cruise ship the Ruby Princess, which allegedly led to 663 people catching Covid and 28 people dying. The class action is backed by funder Balance Legal Capital, with Shine Lawyers representing the class.

Insights

Boundary Fares Case – Wins In Court Of Appeal

Drew Baker of Charles Lyndon shares that the UK Court of Appeal has upheld the Competition Appeal Tribunal’s decision to approve collective proceeding orders in a case being brought, with the backing of Woodsford, against certain train operating companies for failing to make “boundary” fares readily available to Travelcard holders and failing to make passengers aware of their existence.

Before You Go

Never miss a thing in the litigation finance market.