Competition Appeal Tribunal rejects Apple’s attempt to weaken collective lawsuit

In a significant development for millions who use Apple’s UK App Store, the Competition Appeal Tribunal has refused Apple’s attempt to limit the consumer claim led by Dr Rachael Kent, which alleges abuses of competition law that result in systematic overcharging for apps and in-app purchases by Apple.

At a court hearing in May 2022, Apple attempted to argue that the aspect of Dr Kent’s claim which alleges that Apple’s 30% commission is unfair and excessive should not be allowed to proceed, on the basis that Dr Kent had applied the wrong legal test and her claim was therefore defective. But in a judgment handed down in late June, the Tribunal dismissed all of Apple’s arguments, and in doing so, rejected Apple’s attempt to limit Dr Kent’s claim.

Dr Kent’s legal claim will now proceed in full to trial, putting added pressure on Apple amid mounting efforts around the world to hold it to account for alleged anticompetitive practices. The UK’s Competition and Markets Authority and the European Commission are separately investigating Apple’s conduct in the App Store. The company is also facing regulatory action in the Netherlands, Australia, South Korea, India and elsewhere.

Dr Kent is represented by Lesley Hannah, Luke Streatfeild, Sofie Edwards, Kio Gwilliam, Anna Stellardi and Antonio Delussu at law firm Hausfeld & Co. LLP, with barristers Ronit Kreisberger QC and Michael Armitage from Monckton Chambers, Mark Hoskins QC, Jennifer MacLeod and Matthew Kennedy from Brick Court Chambers, and George McDonald from 4 New Square. Dr Kent has also instructed expert economist Derek Holt from AlixPartners UK LLP.

Vannin Capital is funding the claim.

 

Keep Reading

New Fundings

Apple, Google hit with collective claims in Portugal

Eskariam, a Spanish legal services company specialising in collective claims, is financing the early stage costs of collective competition claims against Apple and Google that have been filed with the Portuguese Competition Court. The claims aim to recover compensation of up to €198 million. Portuguese firms J+Legal and Cardigos are leading the claims, with support from Hausfeld and Eskariam.

New Fundings

Vannin backs Australian class actions over app store commissions

Vannin Capital is backing two new class actions commenced in the Federal Court of Australia against Apple and Google. The claims, filed by Phi Finney McDonald on behalf of the lead applicants, allege that the tech giants engaged in anti-competitive conduct in relation to the operation of their app stores. By routinely charging a 30% commission to app developers and limiting their ability to distribute apps outside of the app stores, it is alleged that Apple and Google limited competition in the market which resulted in higher prices for consumers.

In the News

CAT certifies Augusta-backed collective claim

The UK’s Competition Appeal Tribunal has certified the collective claim filed by UK consumer champion Which? against Qualcomm for over £480 million. The claim is on behalf of a class of millions of UK consumers and alleges that Qualcomm abused its dominance in the markets for smartphone chipsets and standard essential patents, leading to higher smartphone prices for consumers. Augusta Ventures is backing the claim. Hausfeld is acting for the class representative.

Before You Go

Never miss a thing in the litigation finance market.