Litigation Finance Insider

Litigation Finance Insider

Akin Gump

All articles about Akin Gump.

Bench Walk to back Sears insolvency litigation

Counsel for the official committee of unsecured creditors of Sears Holdings is seeking court approval of a US $35 litigation funding facility with Bench Walk Advisors. Sears Holdings, the parent company of the iconic Sears retail brand, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in October 2018. While under creditor protection, litigation was commenced by a restructuring subcommittee seeking over $2 billion in damages arising from certain pre-filing related party transactions. $25 million was set aside to cover the initial costs of the litigation, but these funds are now near exhaustion. In order to continue in the pursuit of the claims, a competitive process was initiated to secure additional funding. After several rounds of hard-fought and arm’s-length negotiations with Bench Walk and another funder, Bench Walk emerged as the winner.

Sears Holdings May Finally Exit Bankruptcy After Judge Appoints Mediators

Sears Holdings' Chapter 11 bankruptcy case may actually be headed to a conclusion after 3 ½ years. On April 6, Judge Drain appointed three mediators to help settle the litigation brought by Sears Holdings against Eddie Lampert, ESL, and others. If there is no settlement via mediation, it looks like Sears Holdings may get outside funding to continue its litigation. There has been no funding motion filed yet, but a review of Akin Gump's recent fee dockets indicates that potential funding avenues are being explored.

Despite Its Allure, Litigation Funding Is Just ‘The Cost of Doing Business’ for Class Counsel

A US federal district court has rejected a novel request from class counsel for reimbursement of litigation funding expenses, stating that litigation funding is just "the cost of doing business" for class counsel. Among the costs for which counsel sought recovery were a $300,000 payment to a broker that reportedly arranged the litigation funding agreement, as well as $15 million to be paid to the litigation funder, which represented a $5 million return on the funder’s $10 million investment.

Merricks v Mastercard: U.K. Competition Appeal Tribunal Gives Green Light for First Ever ‘Opt-out’ Class Action

Akin Gump shares it key takeaways from the landmark Merricks v Mastercard judgment, noting that the Competition Appeal Tribunal initially raised concerns during the hearing over a unilateral termination clause in favour of the funder and the funding difficulties that it could cause the class mid-proceedings before ultimately concluding that an addendum requiring that the funder’s view to terminate be based on independent legal and expert advice sufficiently addressed those concerns.

Recent Fundings

Funder News

Sign up for our newsletter

Be the first to know

We’ll alert you to key situations and stories you should be aware of.

Save time

We deliver the important litigation finance news and analysis straight to your inbox each Monday morning.

No cost

The newsletter is always free.

Subscribe Now

© Litigation Finance Insider. All Rights Reserved.

Before You Go

Never miss a thing in the litigation finance market.

Subscribe Now