Woodsford backs Toyota diesel defeat device class action

Woodsford is backing a class action against Toyota on behalf of up to half a million owners of diesel-powered Toyota vehicles.

The claim, which was filed filed by Maddens Lawyers in the Supreme Court of Victoria, alleges that Toyota manufactured and sold hundreds of thousands of diesel vehicles to Australian consumers that possess engine design features commonly known as ‘defeat devices’, which tamper with the vehicle’s emissions control system in order to enhance the car’s performance.

Woodsford’s Chief Investment Officer (EMEA & APAC), Charlie Morris, commented:

Toyota’s conduct in this matter is egregious. Not only do these defeat devices deceive consumers into buying a vehicle that is different to what they thought they were buying, they are also damaging to the environment, as diesel cars that do not meet the required emissions standards continue to find their way onto our roads. Woodsford is dedicated to holding big businesses like Toyota to account over wrongdoing of this kind so that consumers receive the compensation they are due, but also in the hope that actions of this kind will lead to a step-change in the behaviour of big business.”

Read more.

Keep Reading


Bankruptcy Update November 2022: Mass Tort Bankruptcies

Deborah Mazer of Woodsford describes the recent explosion in mass tort bankruptcies and urges tort claimants to be as strategic as debtor companies that use the bankruptcy courts to address this liability by seeking out litigation funding to pursue their claims in bankruptcy.

In the News

Sony lawsuit claimant’s reddit Ask Me Anything backfired

An “Ask Me Anything Q&A” on reddit hosted by the lead claimant of the recently filed anti-competition lawsuit against Sony backfired when the claimant evaded questions about how much she and Woodsford, who is backing the claim, stand to gain if they win the case.


Avoiding Fee Fatigue and “Accidental Contingencies” with Late-Stage Litigation Finance

Brendan Dyer of Woodsford explains why partnering with a funder at a late stage of litigation is often a great solution in situations of fee fatigue, where a client has been involved in protracted litigation and is evaluating whether the potential recovery justifies the additional time and money required to prevail, as well as for “accidental contingency situations”, where the scope of the matter has crept beyond the expectations of the funder and the client, and the funder faces the specter of significant financial risk once the budget runs out.

Before You Go

Never miss a thing in the litigation finance market.