Woodsford backs Toyota diesel defeat device class action

Woodsford is backing a class action against Toyota on behalf of up to half a million owners of diesel-powered Toyota vehicles.

The claim, which was filed filed by Maddens Lawyers in the Supreme Court of Victoria, alleges that Toyota manufactured and sold hundreds of thousands of diesel vehicles to Australian consumers that possess engine design features commonly known as ‘defeat devices’, which tamper with the vehicle’s emissions control system in order to enhance the car’s performance.

Woodsford’s Chief Investment Officer (EMEA & APAC), Charlie Morris, commented:

Toyota’s conduct in this matter is egregious. Not only do these defeat devices deceive consumers into buying a vehicle that is different to what they thought they were buying, they are also damaging to the environment, as diesel cars that do not meet the required emissions standards continue to find their way onto our roads. Woodsford is dedicated to holding big businesses like Toyota to account over wrongdoing of this kind so that consumers receive the compensation they are due, but also in the hope that actions of this kind will lead to a step-change in the behaviour of big business.”

Read more.

Keep Reading


Litigation Funding for US Antitrust Matters

The team at Woodsford explains why litigation funding is such a great fit for antitrust matters, and provide insight into the softer benefits of litigation funding, including an additional layer of diligence at an early stage of the process, leading to greater rigour in risk and cost-benefit assessments.


Communications with Potential and Actual Litigation Funders are Protected as Work Product under Narrow Fifth Circuit Precedent

Ryan Schultz of Woodsford shares that a US District Court recently ruled that communications between a plaintiff’s law firm and litigation funders, including those funders that ultimately did not fund the opportunity, were protected under work product privilege, rejecting arguments by Samsung that the documents were not privileged because they were not created with a primary purpose of the present litigation but rather for obtaining funding.

New Fundings

Woodsford funds Dutch class action against Airbus

Woodsford is funding a Dutch class action brought by Scott+Scott on behalf of Airbus investors relating to alleged large-scale corruption and bribery perpetrated by Airbus. Investigations by various authorities subsequently resulted in Airbus having to pay a fine of approximately €3.6 billion (US$4 billion). When this information became publicly known, the price of Airbus shares fell sharply, causing losses to investors.

Before You Go

Never miss a thing in the litigation finance market.