“Dominant Motive...Lies in the Financial Interests of its Backers”: High Court Strikes Out

Jack Thorne of McDermott Will & Emery explains why the UK High Court recently struck out a claim after finding that the “same interest” requirement under CPR 19.8 had not been met and that the claim was motivated by financial recovery for the litigation funder, and not the interests of the would-be class.

Read more.