The UK CAT’s Judicial Output in Damages Litigation and Collective Redress Claims After the UK Supreme Court Ruling in Merricks

Barry Rodger of the University of Strathclyde analyses recent UK CAT case law since the Supreme Court’s seminal ruling in Merricks, including two rulings dealing with disclosure regarding funding arrangements, concluding that the recent period evidences a real change to more large-scale consumer redress claims, utilising the opt-out model advantages allied with the availability of third-party litigation funding.

Read more.